Secondhand Smoke: Worker Health

PDF Format

November 2009

The 2006 U.S. Surgeon General's Report on The Health Consequences of Involuntary Exposure to Secondhand Smoke has concluded that 100% smokefree workplace policies are the only "effective way to eliminate secondhand smoke exposure in the workplace." Though thousands of communities, 26 states (as of July 2009), Washington, D,C., and Puerto Rico have enacted strong 100% smokefree laws to protect worker health, the workplace remains a major source of exposure to secondhand smoke. Almost half of the U.S. workforce is not covered by a smokefree workplace policy.1,2

Nonsmokers and former smokers who are exposed to secondhand smoke in confined workplaces display a significant increase in DNA damage associated with a decrease in DNA repair capacity.3

New York State's clean indoor air law caused a reduction of secondhand smoke exposure in nonsmoking workers, with saliva cotinine levels decreasing by 47.4 percent. Cotinine is a metabolite of nicotine.4

HOSPITALITY WORKERS

Hospitality worker health improves dramatically with the passage of smokefree laws.

BLUE-COLLAR WORKERS


May be reprinted with appropriate attribution to the American Nonsmokers' Rights Foundation, © 2009.

REFERENCES

  1. U.S. Department of Health and Human Services, "The Health Consequences of Involuntary Exposure to Tobacco Smoke: A Report of the Surgeon General," U.S. Department of Health and Human Services, Centers for Disease Control and Prevention, National Center for Chronic Disease Prevention and Health Promotion, Office on Smoking and Health, 2006.
  2. American Nonsmokers' Rights Foundation, "U.S. 100 percent smokefree laws in workplaces and restaurants and bars," American Nonsmokers' Rights Foundation, http://no-smoke.org/pdf/WRBLawsMap.pdf, October 2, 2009.
  3. Fracasso, M.E.; Doria, D.; Franceschetti, P.; Per bellini, L.; Romeo, L., "DNA damage and repair capacity by comet assay in lymphocytes of white-collar active smokers and passive smokers (non- and ex-smokers) at workplace," Toxicology Letters 167(2): 131-141, December 1, 2006.
  4. Bauer, U.; Juster, H.; Hyland, A.; Farrelly, M.; Engelen, M.; Weitzenkamp, D.; Repace, J.; Babb, S., "Reduced secondhand smoke exposure after implementation of a comprehensive statewide smoking ban - New York, June 26, 2003-June 30, 2004," Morbidity and Mortality Weekly Report 56(28): 705-708, July 20, 2007.
  5. RTI International, "First Annual Independent Evaluation of New York's Tobacco Control Program," New York State Department of Health, http://www.health.state.ny.us/nysdoh/tobacco/reports/docs/nytcp_eval_report_final_11-19-04.pdf. November 2004.
  6. Farrelly, M.C.; Nonnemaker, J.M.; Chou, R.; Hyland, A.; Peterson, K.K.; and Bauer, U.E., "Changes in hospitality workers' exposure to secondhand smoke following the implementation of New York's smoke-free law," Tobacco Control 14(4): 236-241, August 2005.
  7. Palmersheim, K.A., et al., "Madison Bartenders Baseline Survey: Preliminary Findings - Brief Report," Tobacco Surveillance & Evaluation Program, University of Wisconsin, Comprehensive Cancer Center, September 2005.
  8. Palmersheim, K.; Wegner, M.; Remington, P., "Health effects of smoke-free bars in Wisconsin," Wisconsin's Comprehensive Cancer Control Program Surveillance Brief 3(1), April 2007.
  9. Pierce, J.P.; Leon, M.E., "Special report: policy - effectiveness of smoke-free policies," Lancet Oncology 9: 614-615, July 2008.
  10. Building Trades Unions Ignite Less Tobacco [BUILT] Project, "Unions yes [and] tobacco no," California: Department of Health Services, 2001.
  11. Clark, III, J.D.; Wilkinson, J.D.; LeBlanc, W.G.; Dietz, N.A.; Arheart, K.L.; Fleming, L.E.; Lee, D.J., "Inflammatory markers and secondhand tobacco smoke exposure among U.S. workers," American Journal of Industrial Medicine 51(8): 626-632, May 14, 2008.